Jimi Agbaje
LAGOS—More controversies have continued to trail the recent
endorsement of Mr. Akinwumi Ambode by the Oba of Lagos, Rilwanu Akiolu 1, to
succeed Governor Babatunde Fashola of Lagos. The Senate Minority Whip, Senator
Ganiyu Solomon, weekend picked holes in the endorsement, saying the monarch was
only expressing his personal opinion.
Meanwhile, leaders of Democratic
People Alliance, DPA, in Lagos, have said the party’s governorship candidate in
2011, Mr. Jimi Agbaje, remains the only candidate capable of unlocking the
potentials of the state for accelerated and even development.
They spoke weekend when the party
and coordinators at the wards, local and state government levels, re-grouped to
resuscitate his campaign structures ahead of 2015 general elections.
Speaking after a meeting of leaders
and coordinators of DPA held at Maryland in Lagos, coordinator of the forum,
Mr. Olayiwola Popoola, insisted that Agbaje remained the only candidate for his
group.
Popoola said although Agbaje was yet
to decide, he maintained that his group was speaking Agbaje’s mind and that his
campaign structures that promoted his identity in 2011 were still intact.
Solomon, on his part, told newsmen,
that the traditional ruler’s comment was merely a political statement.
He said: “Let me say that in making
the pronouncement, Kabiyesi was expressing his preference. He has also
expressed his personal opinion. We are talking of a party now; I don’t know
which part or provision of the constitution of the party says a traditional
ruler endorses or can endorse. Whatever he says is his personal wish, which is
not the same thing as the wish of the generality of the people. At the end of
the day, we have a party structure. Let me also tell you that he made the
pronouncement at a time when we had not even concluded putting party structures
in place. So, it could have been in consultation with who? Is it with the
political leadership? Is it with the traditional leadership? We have had
different opinions since then. We deliberately did not come out to say anything
about it because we felt it was a political statement. And what do you do with
political statements? You either respond or leave it. In this case, we decided
to leave it.
“Every vote carries the same weight,
regardless of the status of the individual. So, what anybody can do is to go
behind his chosen and preferred aspirant, mobilise people behind him, and
provide a level playing field. It is the provision of the constitution; that is
the tenet of democracy – provide a level playing field.”
No comments:
Post a Comment